In drug cases it works more than most have a clue about, especially in small jurisdictions that are big on asset seizure. The media rarely covers it. Seen it many times. I should have used the word enticement instead. The reports read like she "waited up" for the thief's return. Her damage to her vehicle is classified as an "intentional tort." And she deserves NO compensation for intentionally damaging her property. While I understand her reaction she is and was not helpful to the cause of JUSTIFIABLE use of a firearm.