Considering she had the keys stolen in an earlier burglary a case could be made for entrapment/enticement. If she had 2 or more living brain cells getting the locks re-keyed is and not costly.
Considering she had the keys stolen in an earlier burglary a case could be made for entrapment/enticement. If she had 2 or more living brain cells getting the locks re-keyed is and not costly.
Wake Up...Grow Up...Show Up...Sit Up...Shut Up...Listen Up
"Typing the word "grandparents," I mistyped and the autocorrect changed it to CandyLand. Not entirely inaccurate." - Our daughter.
A Kahr, a Glock, a Ruger, two Brownings, two Remingtons, and a Crossman.
No, not really. The elements of entrapment are much more strict than that. First, you must prove that the subject would not have been likely to perform the crime, except for the enticement. That's already out the window, since he'd previously broken in, so just forget entrapment. It's a defense which almost never works, anyway. One thing which bothers me about it is that I doubt her insurance company will even cover her self-inflicted damage to the vehicle. The only possible coverage would be collision, which will cover your own damage, if it's owing to negligence. Filling your own vehicle with holes doesn't speak to negligence - it was intentional, so I think she would be denied coverage. All in all, pretty stupid. She obviously wanted his ass and she'll have to pay for it...
Hope she gets away with it!
NRA Benefactor