To answer the question is the PM better than the CM.
I went with the PM because of the better sights extra mag, and finish. The polygonal rifling is extremely easy to clean but not a deal breaker for me. Over all, If you can find a used PM usually can be bought very reasonably.
On to the Glock vs. PM/CM. I will go you one better. I have a Sig P365 that is not all that much larger than my PM9 plus it carries 11 rounds and shoots like a dream. So good in fact I bought another one which is something I have never done in my well over 50 years of shooting.
That said, The P365 is just that much larger than the PM9 that pocket carry in dress pants really won't work all that well. It is heavier and just enough bulkier to print or draw from in thin wool dress pants. In my opinion, an once for two here and there does make a big difference in ones pocket and the PM9 in a good pocket holster will always be my go to semi for pocket carry. I am not here to sell you on the Sig over the Kahr, but if I am with my family I believe lot and more ammo in the gun always trumps a single stack. Out for dinner? I pocket the smaller and lighter PM9 and have been known to throw an extra mag in my back pocket.
As for the Glock? it looks and feels like a brick compared to the Sig or Kahr.
Last edited by 340pd; 07-20-2018 at 12:20 PM.
"Never pet a burning dog"