CrossBreed Holsters   Mitch Rosen   Kahr Shop   Crimsontrace
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Is the MK9 the best?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Jax, Fla
    Posts
    4,533

    Default

    Well, the price is only a "suggestion."
    A corrupt government tends to be well protected by a thin white line of bureaucracy.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    4,925

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Canine Dave View Post
    That was an interesting article. Funny how he complained about the poor finish of his prototype sample. I wonder what it looked like after he had it refinished? I like to imagine a K9 with a deep "Colt like" blue, the kind you look into a mile.

    MSR in mid '90's was $880? That's $1500 today! Wow.
    A Colt like blue WOULD be nice. Pretty much for any handgun.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Wet & Wild Pacific NW
    Posts
    30,297

    Default

    Guns rarely at least under normal conditions sell anywhere close to MSRP. I think they call it street price which often times is hundreds of dollars less. Of course now with all the war profiteers (yup it's a war) things are insane.
    In Memory of Paul "Dietrich" Stines.
    Dad: Say something nice to your cousin Shirley
    Dietrich: For a fat girl you sure don't sweat much.
    Cue sound of Head slap.

    RIP Muggsy & TMan

    "If you are a warrior legally authorized to carry a weapon and you step outside without that weapon, then you become a sheep, pretending that JOCKO will not come today."

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    N.E. Ohio
    Posts
    278

    Default

    Indeed. My pre-war K9 was $500 at Bud's about one year ago. They had all you wanted.

    Sometimes I regret not spending a few extra bucks and getting the anniversary model. I think the biggest reason I balked is that I'm not quite ready for a painted gun.

  5. #15

    Default

    I’ve had a number of Kahrs.
    The K9. Probably the best compromise of shootability and, portability.
    The K40. Never was reliable for me. Really liked it.
    The MK9. Fantastic. Reliable. Easy to shoot. Just a little chunky and heavy.
    PM9. Reliable. Good trigger. Easy to carry. Sold it. Likely shouldn’t have. In its niche, it was fantastic.
    Kahr T9. Unbelievable ergonomics. Reliable, easy to shoot. Literally, I sent them my hand and said “build a gun to fit that.”

    The only one I currently own is the T9. I’d take any of them again. Slight hesitation on the K40 for me.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Gwinnett County, Georgia
    Posts
    3,411

    Default

    I don't own one, but I do have a MK40N and it is very good. It has never failed, and for some reason I can't explain, I shoot it more accurately than any of my larger pistols. That includes three HK's, three SIG's and five 1911's. However it's too heavy for pocket carry, so I'll keep my "less accurate ??" PM9.

    BTW, another plea for an MK45!!!

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    The Free Zone
    Posts
    5,472

    Default

    Never owned or shot a MK9.
    Love my MK40 Elite.
    But it is a bit heavy for a pocket pistol.
    In retrospect I should have gotten a M40 or T40.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    110

    Default

    I've owned a K9 since they were new. I rented a MK9 years ago and found that I could shoot it nearly as well as the K9, but never bought one because the weight put it into the class of holster pistol for me since I had lighter options. Now, if I find a more than reasonable deal on a PM9, I could go for that. If it's as reliable as the other 9mm Kahrs I've shot, I'd call that one the best (for pocket carry).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Tommy Gun   Magnum Research new   Tommy Gun Shop   Xssights