I'm new to Kahr pistols. I often see their triggers compared to long double action revolver triggers. However all of the double action revolvers I've shot have a wall that you can feel right before the hammer drops which signals to you that the gun is on the edge of firing. The Kahr trigger is of course very similar to revolvers in the long smooth pull, but different in that there is no wall to signal that the hammer/striker is on the edge of dropping. Maybe there are some revolvers out there with no wall like a Kahr, I'm not sure. The long trigger pull actually doesn't bother me. What I'm on the fence about is the lack of a wall at the end of the long pull to give a sensory feeling that the pistol is about to fire. Do any of you actually prefer no wall and prefer the Kahr trigger over a Smith & Wesson trigger or Sig trigger or Glock trigger? Or would you prefer a wall but have learned to do your best with the Kahr trigger as it is? I want to like Kahr pistols. To this day still no one else makes a nicer smaller micro 9mm than the PM9/CM9. Their lower ammo capacity doesn't even bother me - it's less weight and statistically you don't need more than their 7 rounds anyway. I'd like to make the CM9 my weapon of choice but haven't quite wrapped my brain around the trigger yet.