Kahr Shop   Tommy Gun Shop   Magnum Research new   Tommy Gun
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: 124 or 147gr 9mm?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    99

    Default

    I prefer 147 gr.
    Assuming the round functions 100% in your gun the 147 will offer more penetration which is the 2nd most important thing in defense ammo IMHO.
    Also 147 loses less velocity from a shorter barrel than a 124gr. will.

    I carry a Kahr P9 and use Federal 147 HST or Winchester Ranger T 147gr.

    If I were going to carry a lighter round it would be the 115+p Corbon DPX

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    130

    Default

    I would think that 147 gr would be ideal in the P9, agree on the dps also in the PM9. It is one of my 3 carry rounds, alot with gold dots and power ball.. I know the pwoer ball doesn't come up to the standards of the dpx or gold dot but for some reason that round just seems to grow on me, so I keep it around. If feeds perfectly, all the time, any time and it seems anyway I rack my PM9 to...

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Chattanooga
    Posts
    475

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. S View Post
    If I were going to carry a lighter round it would be the 115+p Corbon DPX
    That is a fine round for sure.
    I was just reading about it a while ago.
    Where are we going and why am I in this hand-basket?

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    130

    Default

    If u think about it, there is really not much "junk" American made defense ammo out there. Some are better than others but even the lowest on the totem pole is light years ahead of what we had 15 years ago. Powder is better, bullets are far better, .

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Chattanooga
    Posts
    475

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jocko View Post
    If u think about it, there is really not much "junk" American made defense ammo out there. Some are better than others but even the lowest on the totem pole is light years ahead of what we had 15 years ago. Powder is better, bullets are far better, .
    Today's ammo is indeed light years ahead of what we use to have.
    Heck, I remember when the best you could find was a S&W 38 with lead bullets. They'd cut an X on the end and call them "dum dums".
    Put a lot of BGs belly-up with them though.
    Where are we going and why am I in this hand-basket?

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    4,420

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 500KV View Post
    Today's ammo is indeed light years ahead of what we use to have.
    Heck, I remember when the best you could find was a S&W 38 with lead bullets. They'd cut an X on the end and call them "dum dums".
    Put a lot of BGs belly-up with them though.
    .......and then SuperVel came along and we could rejoice in our salvation.
    NRA Benefactor

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Chattanooga
    Posts
    475

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ltxi View Post
    .......and then SuperVel came along and we could rejoice in our salvation.
    Right lt; That 110gr 38spl Super-vel was a virtual revolution back then.
    It would seem that was where the modern day ammo advances began and still a heck of a round IMO, especially in 357mag.
    Where are we going and why am I in this hand-basket?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Crimsontrace   Mitch Rosen   Xssights   CrossBreed Holsters