CrossBreed Holsters   Tommy Gun Shop   Xssights   Crimsontrace
Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 56

Thread: Self Defense Ammo for CM9

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    213

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PCollen View Post
    Does all this REALLY make any difference at distances of 3 to 15 feet. You're not going to get into a gun fight in a self-defense situation at 50 feet, or even 30 feet. It's gonna be close up and personal. It will be in a room in your house, not out in the back yard. Or maybe in your driveway when you are getting out of your car, or some whacked out tramp pulling a knife on you at a 7-11.

    Does it really matter whether a bullet expands or not? Absolutely it makes
    a difference at 21, 15, or 3 feet. Regardless of the distance the idea is to
    make a projectile with a relatively low bullet coefficient expand into a
    diameter to cause as much trauma as possible while reaching sufficient depth.

    Consider this, if you were attacked by a whacked out tramp with a knife
    while you were at the ATM and all you had time to do was draw. rock your
    arm up and fire from arms length, what do you think will happen if you hit
    him with a FMJ? What about a Gold Dot or Golden Saber? Which would
    you rather have? And why?

    If you're answer is that you'd rather have a modern hollowpoint over
    an FMJ, then let me ask the next question....would you rather have
    a hollow point that has been proven to fail 30-40% of the time?
    (Meaning not expand ie. Federal Hydra-Shok 147gr, WWB 147 JHP)
    when for the same amount of money you could be carrying a load that had
    been proven to expand 80-90% of the time? (Federal HST, Speer Gold Dot,
    Remington Golden Saber, etc)

    The difference in cost between WWB 147gr JHP (~$20/50) and Speer Gold
    Dot (~27/50) is less than $10. For $10 why wouldn't you give yourself
    every advantage in the highly unlikely event that you have to use your
    gun to defend yourself at ANY distance?

    Michael-

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    On The Beach In South West Florida
    Posts
    602

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael W. View Post
    Does it really matter whether a bullet expands or not? Absolutely it makes
    a difference at 21, 15, or 3 feet. Regardless of the distance the idea is to
    make a projectile with a relatively low bullet coefficient expand into a
    diameter to cause as much trauma as possible while reaching sufficient depth.

    Consider this, if you were attacked by a whacked out tramp with a knife
    while you were at the ATM and all you had time to do was draw. rock your
    arm up and fire from arms length, what do you think will happen if you hit
    him with a FMJ? What about a Gold Dot or Golden Saber? Which would
    you rather have? And why?

    If you're answer is that you'd rather have a modern hollowpoint over
    an FMJ, then let me ask the next question....would you rather have
    a hollow point that has been proven to fail 30-40% of the time?
    (Meaning not expand ie. Federal Hydra-Shok 147gr, WWB 147 JHP)
    when for the same amount of money you could be carrying a load that had
    been proven to expand 80-90% of the time? (Federal HST, Speer Gold Dot,
    Remington Golden Saber, etc)

    The difference in cost between WWB 147gr JHP (~$20/50) and Speer Gold
    Dot (~27/50) is less than $10. For $10 why wouldn't you give yourself
    every advantage in the highly unlikely event that you have to use your
    gun to defend yourself at ANY distance?

    Michael-
    +1 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Notables:
    Kimber Custom II 1911 .45 ACP ("How sweet it is")
    Kahr CM9 9mm - Trijicon night sights, Wolff 5# striker spring
    Glock 19 Gen 3 9mm - Meprolight night sights, BTGuiderod stainless steel captured guide rod, Ghost Ranger trigger connector, Vickers mag release
    Taurus 85 Stainless Steel .38 Special
    1977 Smith & Wesson 19-4 2.5" .357 Magnum - Wolff springs, Professional trigger job
    1955 Hi-Standard Sentinel R-100 .22lr
    1958 Marlin Golden 39-A Mountie .22lr
    Norinco SKS 7.62x39

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,374

    Default

    Just because it expands does not mean it feeds well, and Speer Gold Dot is over double the cost of WWB here. Cost aside, it feeds like crap in my PM9 compared to WWB. So long as I don't have to slingshot a round they all work, but if you want to talk reliable consider everything.

    It's not a price thing for me, I get what works best. Federal HST 147 in my XDM and P-01, WWB 147 JHP in my PM9.

    Posted from my Thunderbolt using Tapatalk.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    On The Beach In South West Florida
    Posts
    602

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thunder71 View Post
    Just because it expands does not mean it feeds well, and Speer Gold Dot is over double the cost of WWB here. Cost aside, it feeds like crap in my PM9 compared to WWB. So long as I don't have to slingshot a round they all work, but if you want to talk reliable consider everything.

    It's not a price thing for me, I get what works best. Federal HST 147 in my XDM and P-01, WWB 147 JHP in my PM9.
    You can do whatever you want. However, I don't think you'll find many people who are experienced shooters and who carry, will agree with you. You don't have to use Gold Dot. There are many other quality rounds out there. I'm sure you can find one that doesn't "feel like crap" (whatever that means). But, please don't bet your life on WWB.
    Notables:
    Kimber Custom II 1911 .45 ACP ("How sweet it is")
    Kahr CM9 9mm - Trijicon night sights, Wolff 5# striker spring
    Glock 19 Gen 3 9mm - Meprolight night sights, BTGuiderod stainless steel captured guide rod, Ghost Ranger trigger connector, Vickers mag release
    Taurus 85 Stainless Steel .38 Special
    1977 Smith & Wesson 19-4 2.5" .357 Magnum - Wolff springs, Professional trigger job
    1955 Hi-Standard Sentinel R-100 .22lr
    1958 Marlin Golden 39-A Mountie .22lr
    Norinco SKS 7.62x39

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,374

    Default

    I've tried quite a few in it, and WWB has done quite fine.

    Hornady Critical Defense
    Federal HST
    Federal Home Defense
    Federal Hyda Shok
    Speer Gold Dot

    I have a box of Winchester PDX to try once I get my slide back from its Cerakote job.

    Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    On The Beach In South West Florida
    Posts
    602

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thunder71 View Post
    I've tried quite a few in it, and WWB has done quite fine.

    Hornady Critical Defense
    Federal HST
    Federal Home Defense
    Federal Hyda Shok
    Speer Gold Dot

    I have a box of Winchester PDX to try once I get my slide back from its Cerakote job.
    I don't mean to beat a dead horse. But, I think your missing the point. There is more to a load than just it going bang. The value of a self defense round is measured it its terminal performance. You have a much, much, much, much, higher chance of stopping a bad guy with a top quality round than WWB. Like in other activities, you want to put the odds in your favor. So, why would anyone start 30-40% behind by using a sub-standard load?

    Try:
    Remington Golden Saber
    Cor-Bon
    Winchester Ranger
    Double Tap
    and the list goes on...
    Notables:
    Kimber Custom II 1911 .45 ACP ("How sweet it is")
    Kahr CM9 9mm - Trijicon night sights, Wolff 5# striker spring
    Glock 19 Gen 3 9mm - Meprolight night sights, BTGuiderod stainless steel captured guide rod, Ghost Ranger trigger connector, Vickers mag release
    Taurus 85 Stainless Steel .38 Special
    1977 Smith & Wesson 19-4 2.5" .357 Magnum - Wolff springs, Professional trigger job
    1955 Hi-Standard Sentinel R-100 .22lr
    1958 Marlin Golden 39-A Mountie .22lr
    Norinco SKS 7.62x39

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,374

    Default

    If the round nosedives you're at 0 percent and a couple seconds to clear a misfeed is an eternity with a gun pointed at you I would imagine.

    I get the point and the logistics and I've also seen tests where WWB 147gr JHP does just fine, it cycles well and goes bang every time. If it fed my HST's as well as it feeds the WWB I'd use HST's across the board and simplify my life to boot.

    I'll see how the PDX's do, then try the ones above that I can find locally. It's important to me to have access to the ammo I decide on, I realize I can order it online but I prefer to do business locally when possible.

    Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    On The Beach In South West Florida
    Posts
    602

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thunder71 View Post
    If the round nosedives you're at 0 percent and a couple seconds to clear a misfeed is an eternity with a gun pointed at you I would imagine.

    I get the point and the logistics and I've also seen tests where WWB 147gr JHP does just fine, it cycles well and goes bang every time. If it fed my HST's as well as it feeds the WWB I'd use HST's across the board and simplify my life to boot.

    I'll see how the PDX's do, then try the ones above that I can find locally. It's important to me to have access to the ammo I decide on, I realize I can order it online but I prefer to do business locally when possible.
    Cool, enough said. Except that many of other people who use your gun model, have success with all of those high quality rounds mentioned here. You have nose dives with them. If the only hollow point round your gun will run is WWB, I'd look at the gun and or the mag, not at the ammo.
    Notables:
    Kimber Custom II 1911 .45 ACP ("How sweet it is")
    Kahr CM9 9mm - Trijicon night sights, Wolff 5# striker spring
    Glock 19 Gen 3 9mm - Meprolight night sights, BTGuiderod stainless steel captured guide rod, Ghost Ranger trigger connector, Vickers mag release
    Taurus 85 Stainless Steel .38 Special
    1977 Smith & Wesson 19-4 2.5" .357 Magnum - Wolff springs, Professional trigger job
    1955 Hi-Standard Sentinel R-100 .22lr
    1958 Marlin Golden 39-A Mountie .22lr
    Norinco SKS 7.62x39

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,374

    Default

    I clearly stated it shoots them all just fine, I've had 0 failure to feeds or failures of any kind with the gun, the only problem I have is when I slingshot a round, sometimes they will go, most often they will not - the WWB has never once nose dived.

    May be a miniscule issue, but it's an advantage over the others. I guess everyone has to weigh their priorities, nobody can predict the future and know whether a nose dive will occur or a round won't be the right one to stop a threat, or more likely, you'll never need to fire in self defense at all.

    Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk

  10. #30
    mightymouse Guest

    Default

    So if the only thing that works in your gun is Wally World cheap-o, then give it up and settle for it? Picky guns are for the back of the safe.
    Absolutely not! Do what it takes to have a premium ammo feed flawlessly through your gun. Send it back to Kahr if necessary or get gun that eats what you feed it. You're betting your life on it after all.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Mitch Rosen   Kahr Shop   Magnum Research new   Tommy Gun