Go Back   KahrTalk Forums > Use and Carry Sub-forums > Ammunition

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-13-2012, 07:12 PM
Ljutic Ljutic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 470
Default Corbon DPX 380 Ballistics Test

I finally got the test done and the blog updated. I know several (Jocko) of you wanted me to do the test (Jocko). I also tested Powrball and the standard Corbon JHP loads, but have not had the chance finish editing up the video and writing up the blog.

So for now you can enjoy the DPX test. http://mousegunaddict.blogspot.com/2...auto-test.html
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-13-2012, 08:47 PM
JFootin's Avatar
JFootin JFootin is online now
KahrTalk 5K Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: The Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 5,977
Default

Thanks! Your tests and clear documentation of the results are of great value to us as we try to decide what ammo to buy and use in our SD weapons. Cudos to you!
__________________
Very interesting...

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-14-2012, 07:53 AM
Yogi 117's Avatar
Yogi 117 Yogi 117 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Salem OR
Posts: 452
Default

Thx again for posting your valuable test results. Your efforts are very much appreciated!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-15-2012, 06:56 AM
TeamCORBON TeamCORBON is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 2
Default

Nice job!

Keep in mind that when we developed the DPX line of ammunition, there was no .380 or .32 caliber handgun bullets in existense then. We initially started with the 9mm, 40, and 45 auto, then expanded to 38 Spl, 357 Mag etc. It wasn't until a few years later that we had the inclination to try it in .380 caliber. We worked with Barnes Bullet Co. on a new projectile and tried as we might, we could get the perfect expansion we wanted along with deeper penetration. We could get one or the other but not both. We settled on recovered diameters of almost double diameter. This is/was unheard of with the .380 caliber. Some loads expanded some, but none expanded this much. We were willing to sacrifice the deeper penetration for the superior expansion, keeping in mind that this is generally a very close range caliber. We have no doubt that 2 or 3 hits at very close range will make quite a difference in the bad guys attitude towards us.

Thanks again and keep up the good work!

Mike Shovel
National Sales Manager
CORBON/Glaser
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-16-2012, 08:57 PM
Ljutic Ljutic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 470
Default

Thanks for the response Mike. Now I'm getting yammering from the P-32 crowd to test the .32 DPX. I just did a test on the the old style .32 JHP last month. http://mousegunaddict.blogspot.com/2...shoot-out.html Now the word is out that there is a new bullet in the Corbon .32 JHP out in the marketplace so folks want me to test that too.

Your point is really quite valid about terminal performance trade offs. No matter how good or bad certain aspects of terminal performance may be, I wouldn't want to be on the receiving end of anything I've tested so far.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-21-2012, 01:39 PM
josp josp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 175
Default

Excellent work as always! I'm excited to read about my choice for the P380, the Corbon powerball.

1073 fps as you said in your DPX video ain't too shabby from the mouse gun!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-21-2012, 01:44 PM
jocko's Avatar
jocko jocko is offline
Perpetual New Guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 344
Default

I will take the expansion of the 380 over penetration... If my minds erves me well the 380 dpx was actually tested in two kel teck 380's. As their test guns. as back then the kt was themost popular 380 on themarket.
__________________
. My PM9 has over 32,000+ rounds through it, and runs much better than an illegal trying to get across our border


NRA ENDOWMENT LIFE MEMBER
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-21-2012, 04:18 PM
Ljutic Ljutic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by josp View Post
Excellent work as always! I'm excited to read about my choice for the P380, the Corbon powerball.

1073 fps as you said in your DPX video ain't too shabby from the mouse gun!
Taking a little break this week for some family R&R. I queued up two 9mm tests to post this week and will be back to wrap up the Corbon PowRball and 90 grain JHP tests next week.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-08-2012, 08:42 AM
cesande cesande is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 173
Default

Been off the forums for quite a while, just wanted to chime in to say thanks for all of the testing of the Corbon 380 ammo... it really does give me the information I was looking (and clamoring) for... so... thanks again !
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
2009 KahrTalk.com. All Rights Reserved.