Go Back   KahrTalk Forums > Use and Carry Sub-forums > Ammunition

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-13-2012, 06:14 PM
jg rider's Avatar
jg rider jg rider is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NW Oregon, where palm trees grow
Posts: 438
Default Some Ammo Test Results For PM9s & K9s

Since I'm new here I think I should contribute what I discovered

Here's some old PM9 test results I did several years ago with wet packs and 4 layers of denim. The paks were made per instructions to come as close to ballistic gelatin as possible. These represent 5 shot results. These were what we preferred of all the brands and weights we tested. +P ammo was too uncontrollable. Wife and I each conceal carry PM9s during the warm weather. She likes the Win 147 RA9T because of the lower felt recoil of all we tested, for double / triple taps, and so do I. The heavier the bullet, the less the felt recoil. We tested things like Win. Black Talon, Win. bonded stuff, Speer Gold Dots, Hornady Tap and some I don't remember. All these others had mixed results from being uncontrollable to going through 24" of wet pak. When I retested the over penetrating rounds through a 4 1/2" G17 barrel the results were better because of the higher velocity, but I still prefer the 147 HST/RA9T stuff.















Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-13-2012, 06:16 PM
jg rider's Avatar
jg rider jg rider is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NW Oregon, where palm trees grow
Posts: 438
Default

In the winter we each carry K9s. She still uses the Win 147 in her's, but I use Fed 147 HST in mine.









Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-13-2012, 06:17 PM
jg rider's Avatar
jg rider jg rider is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NW Oregon, where palm trees grow
Posts: 438
Default

Here's more K9 results







Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-13-2012, 06:34 PM
JFootin's Avatar
JFootin JFootin is offline
KahrTalk 5K Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: The Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 5,963
Default

Man, that's impressive stuff. I've been wanting to try some 147 grain loads. Some have posted about failure of the slow 147s to expand. They were using gallon jugs of water, I think. Could the four layers of denim be enhancing expansion beyond normal conditions? I mean, who wears four layers of denim? If it were just a T-shirt, might we have seen some failure to expand?
__________________
Very interesting...

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-13-2012, 07:18 PM
jg rider's Avatar
jg rider jg rider is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NW Oregon, where palm trees grow
Posts: 438
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JFootin View Post
Man, that's impressive stuff. I've been wanting to try some 147 grain loads. Some have posted about failure of the slow 147s to expand. They were using gallon jugs of water, I think. Could the four layers of denim be enhancing expansion beyond normal conditions? I mean, who wears four layers of denim? If it were just a T-shirt, might we have seen some failure to expand?
Hi JFootin
The 4 layers of denim is / was the FBI standard to be placed in front of ballistic gelatin. They are testing to make sure that the denim doesn't plug up the bullet cavity so it couldn't expand and to make sure that penetration was adequate. To the FBI penetration was more important than expansion since the 1986 Miami / Dade county shoot out. I believe that bullet weight retention was another factor.
If you look real close at my photos you'll see some denim fibers on the mushroomed rounds
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-13-2012, 07:26 PM
mr surveyor's Avatar
mr surveyor mr surveyor is offline
KahrTalk 1K Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NE Texas
Posts: 2,392
Default

nice work.

If you don't mind me asking, who's wet pack design criteria were you using?

And, do you have the wet pack to gel penetration ratio numbers?

I've been "planning" to do some wetpack testing myself, but just too lazy to properly do the wetpack build.

Thanks for sharing


surv
__________________
________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------

It's not gun control that we need, it's soul control!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-13-2012, 08:04 PM
Thunder71 Thunder71 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,374
Default

Great info, thanks!

Just ordered 100 Federal HST's, thanks... thanks a LOT, grrrr.

Picked the 124 standard pressure based on these findings, I'd imagine your results may have been similar but I didn't see the 124 tested in the PM9 in the test above.
http://glocktalk.com/forums/archive/...t-1196741.html
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-13-2012, 09:11 PM
jg rider's Avatar
jg rider jg rider is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NW Oregon, where palm trees grow
Posts: 438
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr surveyor View Post
nice work.

If you don't mind me asking, who's wet pack design criteria were you using?

And, do you have the wet pack to gel penetration ratio numbers?

I've been "planning" to do some wetpack testing myself, but just too lazy to properly do the wetpack build.

Thanks for sharing


surv
Those tests were done a long time ago. I went through my bookmarks fast and came up with this

http://www.frfrogspad.com/wetpak.htm
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-17-2012, 12:42 PM
Roncodrummer Roncodrummer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1
Default PM 40 ammo

Does anyone have any input on recommended ammo for a Kahr PM40? I am using Blazer 180 gr ball ammo for break in/target, but I'm looking at CorBon 135 gr for personal defense. Any suggestions?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-17-2012, 01:59 PM
TucsonMTB's Avatar
TucsonMTB TucsonMTB is offline
KahrTalk 1K Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,984
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roncodrummer View Post
Does anyone have any input on recommended ammo for a Kahr PM40? I am using Blazer 180 gr ball ammo for break in/target, but I'm looking at CorBon 135 gr for personal defense. Any suggestions?
I have had good luck with Winchester Ranger 135 grain Q4368. Even at $24 per box from Midway at this link, it is less expensive than CorBon.

I believe the bullets CorBon uses are a very similar in shape and their rounds have about the same overall length, so they should feed well too.

Best of luck! Let us know how it all works out.
__________________
It would be so nice if something made sense for a change.
-- Alice in Lewis Carroll's Alice's Adventures in Wonderland
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
2009 KahrTalk.com. All Rights Reserved.