
10-15-2011, 10:03 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: bakersfield, california
Posts: 5
|
|
P45 vs Kimber Compact II?
Ok, I have a Kahr K9 and like it. I also have a Kimber Compact II [officer sized grip holding 7 rounds, 4" barrel] and like that. I have no problems carrying 'cocked and locked'. I have no problems with striker fired pistols.
I have been toying with the idea of a P45 lately. Sometime in the next 6 months I expect to be pursuing a CCW license.
So, is there any great reason to pick the P45 over the Kimber Compact II?
Keep in mind that saving money is good, but the right firearm is better.
Comments, please.
|

10-15-2011, 11:18 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 238
|
|
Be sure and ask this over on the 1911 forum and compare results.
My comments have little to do with the different action styles. Exept one, the Kahr is pull and shoot, the Kimber, pull, wipe safety off, shoot. Not much difference. I use both myself. The Kahr is just a little simpler though.
I've never had a problem of any type with 3 .40 Kahrs, or 1 9mm Kahr. I have a Kimber Classic that has broken a barrel bushing while shooting. And the MIM slide stop gave malfunctions that went away when I replaced it with a Wilson part. I am concerned about the long term strength of the MIM parts the Kimber is full of, and have replaced almost all of them in my Classic with Wilson parts.
I vote Kahr over factory Kimber. Kahr will fix any problems you have, if any.
|

10-15-2011, 11:36 PM
|
 |
KahrTalk 5K Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 8,083
|
|
The P45 is a nice-sized gun... 6+1. I have the PM45 with 5+1 and a P40 with 6+1. I always carry a reload... the largest Kahr capacity with extended grip... good for the range, too. One magazine, especially a single stack, just isn't enough if you have to expend a few rounds while ducking for cover... conditions permitting.
I also have a a Springfield Champion 1911 with 4" barrel. I don't ever see carrying the 1911 concealed. I don't really have a good holster for CCW with it, but all of the Kahrs are great for CCW.
Wynn
__________________
USAF Retired '88, Wife USAF Ret. '96
Avatar: P380 with Buffalo Bore +P 90-gr Gold Dots: ME 240ftlbs/MV 1,053fps
Frédéric Bastiat’s essay, The Law: http://mises.org/books/thelaw.pdf
Thomas Jefferson said
“A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have.”
and
"Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading".
|

10-16-2011, 11:08 AM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near the Gila Mountains in SW AZ.
Posts: 1,945
|
|
Kimber products and their customer service have always done well by me (two full size 1911s and one call to CS), but I don't have a Compact model from them or, for that matter, a Kahr P45 (though Kahr products and CS have also well by me).
I do have a Colt Officer's ACP and a Kahr CW45. I like both pistols quite a bit. They are reliable and accurate. They are very close in size. However, the Kahr is quite a bit lighter and that gives it the nod for concealed carry (actually any carry for prolonged periods). The difference in weight might not be as significant with the Kimber Compact II (alloy frame?), so that might not be as big a consideration for you. I've also found that I like the ergonomics of the CW45 a little better and it's checkered front strap is a big plus in my book. Bottom line for me: both pistols are keepers, but I prefer the CW45 for carry. Then again, I already have both and would recommend that arraignment to you.

Regards,
Greg
Last edited by gb6491; 10-16-2011 at 09:04 PM.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:17 PM.
|
|