I bought a PJ Holster because it looked like the thinnest possible holster available in the marketplace. I was carrying in a Silent Thunder on a daily basis. I now have two options. JFootin was correct. The PJ holster product is just a little thicker than the gun itself. It is light and combortable. I have the over the belt hook and it is extremely quick to put on and remove. It hooks fine over all my double thick gunbelts. It is a joy to wear. Will it put more wear on the gun's finish? Time will tell. I really do not worry a lot about that because my carry guns are all used for a purpose. Gun wear is a badge of honor. The only improvement I could offer this holster is some sort of a sight channel to protect the top of the front sight from wear. At PJ's price, the holster is an absolute steal.
http://pjholster.com/
Now, how to compare to my Silent Thunder. They are different in a number of ways. Without question the Silent Thunder is better designed. By that, I refer to the leather lining, the molded sight channel, thicker kydex, stronger belt clip, and most of all, the unmatched adjust ability and available options from Garrett. The Silent Thunder costs twice as much but you get twice as much.
http://garrettindustries.mybigcommerce.com/
In most cases I really do not see a huge difference when I am wearing one or the other. In tighter pants the PJ wins every time. If you ever think you will want to try appendix carry, or want to play with the holster cant or ride height, the ST will give you that option. In the real world I did it right. I started with the ST and knew what to ask for when I ordered from PJ.
In my world I see a need for owning both. I appreciate the differences and thank both makers for there ingenuity. I will be return customer to both makers.
Now, on to pocket carry? No. I had that issue solved already by James Dean on this forum who make the best leather pocket holster I have ever used.
http://www.facebook.com/jamesdeangunleather
![]()